Bitcoin Forum
September 22, 2018, 04:50:58 AM *
News: ♦♦ New info! Bitcoin Core users absolutely must upgrade to previously-announced 0.16.3 [Torrent]. All Bitcoin users should temporarily trust confirmations slightly less. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 [1108] 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 ... 1251 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.9 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6241150 times)
j2james
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 08:27:53 PM
 #22141

I have this in .bat file

timeout /t 15
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 -ewal 0x26Ff37f6cBa786D906bB2078b52c405DaB3B519A.Miner01 -epsw x -tt 40 -fanmin 100 -fanmax 100 -etha 0 -asm 2 -allpools 1

Thank you. But nothing changes (
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
saltypotato
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 09:11:16 PM
 #22142

Idunno what's with all the whining, v11.4 runs great.

Modded RX 580 Gaming X 8G getting 30.8 Mh/s ETH & 1.175 Gh/s XVG on Win 10, beta drivers with semi-conservative Claymore settings.
Using MSA to set fans at 38% for ~51c on all cards (plus 12V fans blowing through the GPUs), 68F ambient temperature.

Could dial things up or down for more or less power/hashes but things are solid, cool, and fast enough. Will tweak things again later.
Should be able to lower wattage by 10 to 15W or bump things up and get 31.25 Mh/s ETH, 1.3 Gh/s XVG and still be stable with reasonable temps but MEH, whatever.
(ETH only = 31.25 Mh/s all day long at -mclock 2200 -dcri 8, 48c, 30% fan. -mclock 2225 will do 31.5 but was slightly unstable after 10 hours.)

-etha 0
-estale 0
-dcri 38
-cclock 1215
-cvddc 925
-mvddc 925
-mclock 2200
-tt 59
-tstop 67
-ttdcr 63
-ttli 65
-ftime 10
-minspeed -120
-fanmin 35
-fanmax 55
-gser 1
-allcoins 1
-allpools 1
-dbg -1 (no need to log perfection)
Viaggiatore
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:12:29 PM
 #22143

Idunno what's with all the whining, v11.4 runs great.

Modded RX 580 Gaming X 8G getting 30.8 Mh/s ETH & 1.175 Gh/s XVG on Win 10, beta drivers with semi-conservative Claymore settings.
Using MSA to set fans at 38% for ~51c on all cards (plus 12V fans blowing through the GPUs), 68F ambient temperature.

Could dial things up or down for more or less power/hashes but things are solid, cool, and fast enough. Will tweak things again later.
Should be able to lower wattage by 10 to 15W or bump things up and get 31.25 Mh/s ETH, 1.3 Gh/s XVG and still be stable with reasonable temps but MEH, whatever.
(ETH only = 31.25 Mh/s all day long at -mclock 2200 -dcri 8, 48c, 30% fan. -mclock 2225 will do 31.5 but was slightly unstable after 10 hours.)

-etha 0
-estale 0
-dcri 38
-cclock 1215
-cvddc 925
-mvddc 925
-mclock 2200
-tt 59
-tstop 67
-ttdcr 63
-ttli 65
-ftime 10
-minspeed -120
-fanmin 35
-fanmax 55
-gser 1
-allcoins 1
-allpools 1
-dbg -1 (no need to log perfection)


For me, like others, lots of incorrect shares on dual mining (4% for me is a lot!). Reverted to 11.1 and I have zero incorrects. Hope this will be fixed soon or I will just do solo mining, maybe giving a try to Phoenix
asb1321
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:13:54 PM
 #22144

Hi all,

Not sure why miner can't connect to DCR when dual mining.


I get the message:

DCR: Stratum - cannot connect to yiimp.ccminer.org:3252
DCR: Stratum - failed to connect try in 20 second

and it keep repeating the same.

ETH is mining perfectly.

Anyone one knows the reason please let me know.

Thanks
Metroid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 278


Xtreme Monster


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:16:24 PM
 #22145

I am moving to Phoenix too, dual mining becomes unprofitable, miner is unstable, devfee is huge for Claymore.

I really hope claymore will lower its devfee overall because phoenix miner is much better overall right now and its devfee is 35% lower.

BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
dragonmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 525


🤖UBEX.COM 🤖


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:26:58 PM
 #22146

Here's a question:
If my biggest and main problem with mining is heat, whats the best way to lower the heat from GPUs?
Should I use lower clocks, is there a command line which tells the miner to mine slower/less intense...?
I'm willing to sacrifice the hash speed for lower temps.
Thanks!
Who did you steal that account from?
A legendary member asking the most basic of questions... Where have you been the last 5 years, "legend"?
Cheesy


.GLOBAL DECENTRALIZED ADVERTISING EXCHANGE.

Token sale: MAY 21

                                   ▄█▄       ▄█▄         
                                  █████     █████         
                         ▄██▄      ▀█▀       ▀█▀         
                 ▄█▄     ▀██▀                             
          ▄      ▀█▀                         ▄█▄         
         ▀█▀                       ▄█▄      █████         
                         ▄██▄     █████      ▀█▀         
    ██           ▄█▄     ▀██▀      ▀█▀                   
          ▄      ▀█▀                         ▄█▄         
         ▀█▀                       ▄█▄      █████         
                         ▄██▄     █████      ▀█▀         
    ██           ▄█▄     ▀██▀      ▀█▀                   
                 ▀█▀                                     
           ▄                       ▄█▄       ▄█▄         
          ▀█▀            ▄██▄     █████     █████         
    ██           ▄█▄     ▀██▀      ▀█▀       ▀█▀         
                 ▀█▀                                     
            ▄                       ▄█▄      ▄█▄         
           ▀█▀             ▄██▄    █████    █████         
     ██             ▄█▄    ▀██▀     ▀█▀      ▀█▀         
              ▄     ▀█▀                                   
             ▀█▀                          ▄█▄             
        ██               ▄█▄    ▄██▄     █████           
                   ▄     ▀█▀    ▀██▀      ▀█▀             
                  ▀█▀                                     
             ██                    ▄██▄                   
                     ▄      ▄█▄    ▀██▀                   
                    ▀█▀     ▀█▀                           

▄█    ▄█  ▄█         ▄█████▄    ▀█▄      ▄█▀
██    ██  ██▄▄▄▄▄   ██▀   ▀██     ▀█▄  ▄█▀
██    ██  ██▀▀▀▀██  ██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀       ████   
██    ██  ██    ██  ██▄    ▄█     ▄██▀▀██▄   
▀██████▀  ▀██████▀  ▀███████▀   ▄██▀    ▀██▄
Telegram
Facebook
ANN Thread
Youtube
LinkedIn
Twitter
Medium
Reddit
Github
JamiB54
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:39:28 PM
 #22147

Hello everyone
I wanted to know if your antivirus was not alarmed by Claymore's latest executable.
This is the first time I have this kind of detection, I got the client on Bitcointalk on the Claymore post, both Mega and Googledrive.
I sent the report on the total virus and it shows me this kind of analysis, nothing reassuring


SHA256:    c816be5af9f605605a47c689a89e628239001a84c8ef6e205990696a4ef2fdaf
Nom du fichier :    Claymore's Dual Ethereum Decred_Siacoin_Lbry_Pascal_Blake2s_Kecca...
Ratio de détection :    20 / 60
Date d'analyse :    2018-03-13 16:26:16 UTC (il y a 6 heures, 1 minute)

Virus Total


AegisLab Coinminer.Ethereum.Gen!c 20180313
Antiy-AVL RiskWare[RiskTool]/Win32.AGeneric 20180313
AVware Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT 20180313
CAT-QuickHeal Trojan.IGENERIC 20180313
Cylance Unsafe 20180313
Cyren ZIP/Trojan.FNCY-7 20180313
DrWeb Trojan.BtcMine.2330 20180313
ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win64/CoinMiner.BX potentially unwanted 20180313
Fortinet Riskware/Generic 20180313
GData Archive.Trojan.Agent.HPLYT0 20180313
Ikarus PUA.CoinMiner 20180313
Kaspersky not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win32.Generic 20180313
McAfee Artemis!3E5ABA78FC8F 20180313
NANO-Antivirus Trojan.Win32.BtcMine.eykufr 20180313
Rising PUF.CoinMiner!8.4639 (TFE:5:BmMJEOlyP8T) 20180313
Sophos AV Claymore’s Ethereum Dual Miner (PUA) 20180313
Symantec Trojan.Gen.NPE 20180313
TrendMicro Coinmin.EBF55070 20180313
TrendMicro-HouseCall Suspicious_GEN.F47V0313 20180313
ZoneAlarm by Check Point not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win32.Generic 20180313
j2james
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:39:40 PM
 #22148

Dear @Claymore

Can you tell me is it normal that I have so different total hashrate? What is the problem? Claymore miner or my GPUs?

ETH: 03/14/18-00:34:32 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.318 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 31.565 Mh/s, GPU1 31.692 Mh/s, GPU2 31.724 Mh/s, GPU3 31.362 Mh/s, GPU4 31.246 Mh/s, GPU5 31.729 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:34:39 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 175.209 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 31.697 Mh/s, GPU1 30.633 Mh/s, GPU2 31.702 Mh/s, GPU3 27.850 Mh/s, GPU4 26.629 Mh/s, GPU5 26.699 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:34:45 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 187.369 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 30.963 Mh/s, GPU1 31.333 Mh/s, GPU2 31.082 Mh/s, GPU3 31.158 Mh/s, GPU4 31.410 Mh/s, GPU5 31.422 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:34:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
GPU0 t=40C fan=45%%, GPU1 t=43C fan=46%%, GPU2 t=41C fan=46%%, GPU3 t=38C fan=44%%, GPU4 t=47C fan=48%%, GPU5 t=40C fan=45%%
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:04 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 188.692 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 31.552 Mh/s, GPU1 31.717 Mh/s, GPU2 31.661 Mh/s, GPU3 31.017 Mh/s, GPU4 31.738 Mh/s, GPU5 31.006 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:16 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 173.243 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 31.727 Mh/s, GPU1 28.583 Mh/s, GPU2 28.311 Mh/s, GPU3 28.557 Mh/s, GPU4 28.722 Mh/s, GPU5 27.343 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:24 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 186.359 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 31.709 Mh/s, GPU1 31.355 Mh/s, GPU2 29.162 Mh/s, GPU3 31.366 Mh/s, GPU4 31.320 Mh/s, GPU5 31.446 Mh/s
GPU0 t=41C fan=45%%, GPU1 t=44C fan=47%%, GPU2 t=42C fan=46%%, GPU3 t=39C fan=44%%, GPU4 t=48C fan=49%%, GPU5 t=41C fan=45%%
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:34 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 176.728 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 27.605 Mh/s, GPU1 28.760 Mh/s, GPU2 28.791 Mh/s, GPU3 28.812 Mh/s, GPU4 31.660 Mh/s, GPU5 31.100 Mh/s
ETH: 03/14/18-00:35:45 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 190.346 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 31.749 Mh/s, GPU1 31.683 Mh/s, GPU2 31.743 Mh/s, GPU3 31.737 Mh/s, GPU4 31.724 Mh/s, GPU5 31.710 Mh/s
GPU0 t=42C fan=46%%, GPU1 t=44C fan=47%%, GPU2 t=42C fan=46%%, GPU3 t=39C fan=44%%, GPU4 t=47C fan=49%%, GPU5 t=41C fan=46%%
ETH: 03/14/18-00:36:04 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 185.858 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 28.375 Mh/s, GPU1 31.677 Mh/s, GPU2 31.268 Mh/s, GPU3 31.713 Mh/s, GPU4 31.542 Mh/s, GPU5 31.282 Mh/s
janding
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 136
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:41:33 PM
 #22149

I am moving to Phoenix too, dual mining becomes unprofitable, miner is unstable, devfee is huge for Claymore.

I really hope claymore will lower its devfee overall because phoenix miner is much better overall right now and its devfee is 35% lower.

My take on the two miners

I was a Phoenix fan. Ran it for few a few months.
It is good.
Solid miner.
Hash rate was higher.
Dev fee was lower.

However since I started testing Claymore again starting with v 11.3 and now 11.4

It is good.
Solid Miner.
Hash rate the same or even higher for me than Phoenix now.
Feature rich miner, far more detailed features than Phoenix at present.
Just the setting for temp and clocking alone is far better.
Much lower stale share rate by a large factor than Phoenix.
Claymore fixing the stale share rate alone paid for my 1% dev fee they charge.

Gotta give the nod to Claymore at this time.
These are my experiences and my opinions, you're testing may be different than mine.
peterboy1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:43:30 PM
 #22150

nah, save the hassle. reverted back to v11

no matter what i do with downclocking, i always get random incorrect shares. i dont know whats up with this higher hashrates on latest claymores, but its randomly throwing me a lot of incorrect shares.
cryptoillusion1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 82
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 10:43:59 PM
 #22151

I am using a modded BIOS and have core voltage = -43mv in afterburner
I want to use Claymore for controlling this and wish to use -cvddc
However I am unsure how to translate the -43mv in AB to claymore- since there are differing voltages at different core clock in the bios whereas in claymore only one voltage is entered.

My bios voltages are as below

MHZ   mV
300   750
588   850
900   850
950   840
980   850
1000   860
1050   870
1100   890
1150   900
Teress
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 102


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 11:05:45 PM
 #22152

It looks Claymore prefers AMD over NVIDIA when doing optimizations. Latest v11.4 on Nvidias is not good. Yeah, stable, but lower overall accepted hashrate on pool. Back to ethminer...
j2james
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 11:09:50 PM
 #22153

It looks Claymore prefers AMD over NVIDIA when doing optimizations. Latest v11.4 on Nvidias is not good. Yeah, stable, but lower overall accepted hashrate on pool. Back to ethminer...

Agreed about AMD cards. But I tested Phoenix and ethminer today. Phoenix is too slow. Ethminer is more stable, but has less hasrate then Claymore. Thinking about ethminer. May be will run it in one day to see result. But now I'm still using Claymore 10.6.
Teress
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 102


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 11:12:27 PM
 #22154

It looks Claymore prefers AMD over NVIDIA when doing optimizations. Latest v11.4 on Nvidias is not good. Yeah, stable, but lower overall accepted hashrate on pool. Back to ethminer...

Agreed about AMD cards. But I tested Phoenix and ethminer today. Phoenix is too slow. Ethminer is more stable, but has less hasrate then Claymore. Thinking about ethminer. May be will run it in one day to see result. But now I'm still using Claymore 10.6.

Ethminer for my nvidia rigs is the best. Very stable and consistent hashrate, no drops like Claymore. And my accepted hasrate on pool is quite always above my reported. But need more time to tweek gpus memory, what is good for Claymore and Phoenix, is not good for ethminer = neccessary to find new frequencies.
janding
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 136
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 11:13:41 PM
 #22155

Here's a question:
If my biggest and main problem with mining is heat, whats the best way to lower the heat from GPUs?
Should I use lower clocks, is there a command line which tells the miner to mine slower/less intense...?
I'm willing to sacrifice the hash speed for lower temps.
Thanks!

I know others have given some answers on this.
I use this a normal starting point for adjusting my rig.
These are the first tings you should have done.


1st - Make minor voltage decreases in both clocks. Memory and GPU. Separately, adjust them one at a time.
Test it. See what the temp is when mining by using a utility like GPU-Z.
If you get to low the board will stop working.
Keep adjusting to lower the temp.

Try setting the  -eth value to 8 to start, then lower it down one number at a time when testing.
This adjusts the intensity. It will lower the hash rate, but lower numbers will make the GPU run cooler.

Make settings similar to these in the config file.
Your numbers will vary from what mine are shown here.


-tt 67                      # Sets desired temp for a GPU
-ttli 72                    # Sets the max temp for a GPU before miner automatically starts reducing intensity. This will allow the GPU to run a little cooler but still keep running.
-tstop 75                 # Turn GPU off if this temp is reached until the temp gets to the value in -tstart, then start it up again
-tstart 65                # Temp to start mining again if -tstop temp was reached

Be patient It's takes some time and work to fine tune your rig.
If you didn't do testing and monitoring like the above then you probably didn't set it up correctly from the beginning.


Roadrage68
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 11:14:23 PM
 #22156

I need a little help guys. I have one AMD card (will be adding more) to my 7 card Nidvia rig. I only want to use Claymore for the AMD card. This is my bat file, but it's still running all the cards. Can someone tell me what I need to do to tweak it?

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

-di 0

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:14444 -ewal 0xfe943a6dabf68375754d07044812f76a0dd01d64 -epsw x

Insert -di 0 into config.txt

Seems to have done it. Thanks again.

Yeah, it's still reading all cards. I don't get  it.

Couldn't you add this to single out AMD cards?   "-platform 1"
cryptoillusion1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 82
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 11:16:39 PM
 #22157

Hello everyone
I wanted to know if your antivirus was not alarmed by Claymore's latest executable.
This is the first time I have this kind of detection, I got the client on Bitcointalk on the Claymore post, both Mega and Googledrive.
I sent the report on the total virus and it shows me this kind of analysis, nothing reassuring

This is because all av detect miners as a virus-also read FAQ on Page 1

1.Create a folder MINERS (or any name) - add this folder to windows defender exclusion list
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4028485/windows-10-add-an-exclusion-to-windows-defender-antivirus

If required
2.switch OFF windows defender real time protection and download miner to the above folder
3. switch ON windows defender real time protection
j2james
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 11:29:02 PM
 #22158

Ethminer for my nvidia rigs is the best. Very stable hashrate, no drops like Claymore. And my accepted hasrate on pool is quite always above my reported. But need more time to tweek gpus memory, what is good for Claymore and Phoenix, is not good for ethminer = neccessary to find new frequencies.

Can you comment "But need more time to tweek gpus memory, what is good for Claymore and Phoenix, is not good for ethminer = neccessary to find new frequencies."?

May be you can give me in PM your OC settings for Claymore and for ethminer to compare them to understand how can I play with my settings?
big al
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 14, 2018, 01:06:55 AM
 #22159

nah, save the hassle. reverted back to v11

no matter what i do with downclocking, i always get random incorrect shares. i dont know whats up with this higher hashrates on latest claymores, but its randomly throwing me a lot of incorrect shares.

This is what I've found too with dual mining.  11.3 or 11.4 you have to slow down the cards to get stability but still 4% incorrect shares.

With 11.0 I get slightly slower speeds vs the same card speed but I can turn them up more with stability. I dont have any incorrect shares so far a couple hours in.  The effective speed is much higher.
Chiko.Chavez
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 14, 2018, 01:27:54 AM
 #22160

Yesterday I tried to undervolt my rig and now I am having some major issues, any help would be greatly appreciated.

Code:
Rig is 6x RX 580s (all with mixed Hynix and Samsung memory) on Asus Mining Expert board running blockchain driver with Polaris one click bios.

The usual OC and voltage setting I use in the config file for Claymore's miner are

-cclock 1150
-cvddc 900
-mvddc 950
-mclock 2200

My usual power usage at the wall (when dual mining ETH and XVG) is 1070W, HWinfo usually shows gpu chip power of  97w per card.

The settings I tried were

-cclock 1150
-cvddc 875
-mvddc 925
-mclock 2150

After starting Claymore v 11.4 I went back into the config file and edited the settings back to my usual oc/voltages so that if it crashed it would apply them on reboot.

After about an hour the rig crashed (CCL error gpu 5)it rebooted and it restarted claymore with my usual settings. I noticed that the power usage at the wall had jumped up to around 1285w and HWinfo was showing gpu power usage of around 120w per card. HWinfo and GPU-z were showing that my GPU's were running at the usual clocks/voltages 1150/2200 900/950 so I stopped Claymore and manually restarted my rig.

When it restarted the MB done the initial single beep before posting then tripple beeped and wouldn't post. I powered off the rig, 'flicked the PSU switches off and let it still for a few mins. Powered the rig back up again and same result (single beep, tripple beep not posting).
I powered off the rig unplugged GPU 0 and GPU 1 at the MB, swapped them over (gpu 0 to pcie 1x slot gpu 1 to pcie 16x slot) and the rig posted then booted to Windows went into device manager and it was only picking up 5 of the 6 GPU's (not the GPU that was previously GPU 0).

I shut down the rig, unplugged the GPU at the riser and PSU and rebooted (posted and booted to Windows with no issues), I started Claymore (started mining fine) and when I checked HWinfo/GPU-z same result previous clock/voltage settings with higher gpu power usage (120w per card) than usual.

I stopped Claymore, shut down the rig, unplugged the rig at the wall, put GPU's in there original positions, moved the bios switch on the GPU that wasn't being picked up to 'silent mode' and booted the rig up.

It posted and booted into Windows but was running really odd, mouse movements, opening windows etc were slow and sluggish. I then moved the bios switch back to original position then used ATIflash via cmd to 're flash all cards back to original bios, uninstalled driver via DDU and rebooted the rig. Reinstalled blockchain driver, rebooted and mouse movements, opening windows etc were still slow and sluggish.

Used ATIflash via cmd and flashed all GPU'S with bios I had them running on previously (one click Polaris Bios Editor). Applied atikmdag-patcher and rebooted, things were still running slow and sluggish, ran claymore and it started mining with all 6 GPU'S at original config setting, getting the same Mh/s but all the GPU's are still using more power than they usually would (120w per GPU and whole rig 1285w at wall).

Apologies for how long this is but I wanted to give a good idea on what is happening, what I have tried already etc.

Thoughts? Anyone had a similar issue that the have managed to resolve? Thanks in advance to anyone that can help me.

Ps

How do I put this into one of the 'box thing's' so it doesn't take up so much room on the page?

Thanks cryptoillusion1
Pages: « 1 ... 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 [1108] 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 ... 1251 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!